That splitter in the front is barf-tastic
|
I like it. Waaay sexier than a GT Mustang and honestly the body design will be loved by ricers. Hopefuly convert them. Id much rather see that car behind me than a stupid ass Honda.
|
but still a $50k+ 500hp+ new new shitstang and only pulls in the mid 12's... I'd expect better. almost 20yrs since the last 5.slow and they still can't get it right.
|
ya we know you would like it navy good thing you where able to keep your car because you would be running a stickerd up honda in no time if you didnt have it LOL
|
why the fuck is everyone slapping the rear ends together? Its seriously like they spend so much damn time making the front end look nice that when they get to the rear they're like uhhhh, just make it fat and stick some tail lights in it. The new stangs and Camaro's have GORGEOUS front ends, but DISGUSTING rear ends. Hopefully they will change the rear of the Camaro at least and make it sexy like every Camaro's rear has been before it.
|
i think your WAY overly concerned with rear ends Kevin???
:fagflag: |
Quote:
|
idk about you guys but I need a sexy rear end on anything I have!!! hahahaha Its like a smoking hot chick from the front and then her ass is like big and saggy BLAH!!!!
|
The target of these cars is not your weekend warrior type of car guy. This is the stang thats going to get pampered and not used. Mustangs got a bunch of these "collector" cars. and do a good job of marketing them that way.
In a way I wish GM marketed Bumblebee like this...instead we got a bad Transformers edition car thats not the movie car nor is it special. but back to the idea..sure you could save $$$ and buy something less and put 10K into the car and make it run faster..the idea is your buying a name.. |
i for one still think it sucks to try and bring back a name plate and charge an ass load for it.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.