| sciff5 |
12-07-2009 10:42 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by ILuvPizzaTimes10
(Post 5642)
there is NOOOO way id ever get a C4 there suspension is CRAP. a forth gen out handles them in every way possible in just stock form not to mention what you can add to them. and no offence BUT id rather not be in the same boat you are in. i just bought a 1500 dollar rear end for a reason. So i dont want be back down that road again. No RX7 for me. i dont Just want to go FAST i want a car worthy of building. BUT i may be over reacting to the actual shape of this car. it goes down the road straight and aside from a few common rot spot(rear floor pans/frame rails) i want to fix this car if its cost effective. IE costs less then buying a shell and doing a full swap over. we shall see i can see it costing over 3 grand to buy another car and all the other small shit. Hopefully. But fixing my car shouldnt cost that much and then its still "MY" car. Fuck i dunno what to do. So im gunna get a quote from a GREAT body guy soon and see if he tells me its worth the repairs.
|
I dont know what makes you say their suspension is crap. It was known for being innovative. One of the first american cars with all forged aluminum independent suspension componets. In the 80s the c4 was considered one of the best cars out there for road racing and autox stock car classes, regularly outpacing porches and bmws of the time which today are even still considered great handling cars. Even today they are competitive. Hell a C4 vette won one of the stock autox classes at the SCCA nationals last year for the mens and womens classes.
At the drag strip the manuals already have a Dana44 rear end which is good till about 1.4 60's which have been achieved in manuall shifted cars on stock suspension and they have cut better 60's on stock rear suspension with autos, I belivee down into the mid/ high 1.3s.
I dont know what part of the suspension is really so terrible. Its a great all around setup which is why its prob one of the most commonly used suspensions setups on resto rods.
The only problem I have is the rx7 was never offered with a kick ass rear end like the dana44 so I shouldent really launch near the limiter if I care to drive home afterwards, but I could prob hook right now a 6000rpm launch with nearly stock suspension so IRS can do more than most give it credit for at the track. You saw the rx7 yourself on the stock rear. The c4 is better at not gaining negative camber at launch and are damn near as light as an rx7. Looking back now I kinda wish I went with an C4, at least then I'de be able to race it in real street.
BTW after reading the rest of what posted.. You should just sell off your LT1 stuff and get an truck block 6.0 (LQ4 or LQ9) like don said, do exhaust and a cam, and make more power while probably making money on the deal.
|