View Single Post
  #17  
Old 01-12-2014, 03:06 PM
DavidS's Avatar
DavidS DavidS is offline
Missing a 67
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Granby, CT
Posts: 2,431
Post Thanks / Like
Thanks (Given):
Thanks (Received):
Likes (Given):
Likes (Received):
Dislikes (Given):
Dislikes (Received):
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 84ta406 View Post
I agree the dealership should be doing the right thing but also I can see it from their side. Why pay for a car that was essentially stolen? The employee is the one at fault more than the dealer. Ive heard of similar events happening on more than one occasion and it sucks for anyone involved
From what the owner posted, it looks like the dealer did not want to provide their insurance information. It looks like they are doing that now, so it will probably get straightened out but not very quickly.

edit:

From the Original Poster on page 37: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...333504&page=37

Quote:
At any rate, a retired GM exec called me today to let me know that GM IS involved now. It is our understanding that the matter will be resolved to our satisfaction next week. And GM will make sure that we are treated fairly and equitably.
__________________

68 Camaro (?350 SB)
69 Camaro (L72 427 BB)
69 Camaro (DZ 302 SB - www.z28.net)
Camaro - A friendly flying car – from the French - the first half "camarade/friend" and the last half “aero/of the air".
Reply With Quote