North East F-Body Association

North East F-Body Association (http://www.northeastf-bodyassn.com/index.php)
-   Pictures/Videos (http://www.northeastf-bodyassn.com/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   worlds fastest new cts v. video (http://www.northeastf-bodyassn.com/showthread.php?t=2229)

My84Z 01-18-2011 10:54 PM

that's why they are engineers and you are a bitch :P they know what they are doing stop questioning the design lol. also that car leaves softer on a 1.5 then my 1.7 60's

Formula413 01-18-2011 10:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILuvPizzaTimes10 (Post 36898)
WHY the fuck do you need all that extra weight. does it REALLLLY handle that much better then a properly setup SRA? i mean yeah it has benifits Obviously But worth all that weight???? i dunno.

Well, it is a Cadillac. I'm sure they have pretty high standards for ride quality, even in a performance car. That skip when you hit a bump around corners with a SRA wouldn't cut it for them.

ls6monte 01-18-2011 11:56 PM

Those cars are a bit heavier than they should be- around 4200lbs? Not sure. Most cars nowadays are heavy due to the safety equipment the governmennt makes them put in. Look at the 2010 Camaro- that car is a way too heavy at 4000+ lbs!

Batman 01-19-2011 12:33 AM

I'll take the extra 600# compared to my old F-Body for the ride quality and handling, especially with the kind of power that car puts out. Probably close to half that weight isn't even in the suspension when you think how much stuff that car comes with. It adds up. When you consider that 4th Gen F-bodies strayed upward of 3600 pounds when you optioned them out and pretty much came with a bare cupboard of amenities, and the new ones weigh north of 3800, doesn't seem that bad IMO.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.