North East F-Body Association

North East F-Body Association (http://www.northeastf-bodyassn.com/index.php)
-   Project Logs (http://www.northeastf-bodyassn.com/forumdisplay.php?f=34)
-   -   Red Rocket under knife (http://www.northeastf-bodyassn.com/showthread.php?t=121)

Batman 11-05-2009 01:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slowhawk (Post 3700)
I agree but if you running a stalled auto the Vic junior might give better ET's.

I'm running the Victor because the low end loss doesn't matter since the engine will be singing 5800-7000rpm at the track.

Very true, should have prefaced it with "A street car", vic JR would be good in a big cam high stall race application where low end isn't a necessity

Slowhawk 11-05-2009 02:01 AM

Someday I'll take the time and actually test back - back a FAST against a Carb intake while the car sit's on the dyno.Would like to see what it does on a 346ci.

Batman 11-05-2009 02:38 AM

I've seen it with the GMPP intake and FAST 90 once, the GMPP intake made about 15 more up top with an 850, but the FAST had a better curve and Average power, not sure how they would have been against each other at the track. I am also willing to bet the FAST is alot more efficient in a street or street/strip application, But I do love the feeling of big secondaries opening up on a 4 BBl :)

Slowhawk 11-05-2009 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Batman (Post 3726)
I've seen it with the GMPP intake and FAST 90 once, the GMPP intake made about 15 more up top with an 850, but the FAST had a better curve and Average power, not sure how they would have been against each other at the track. I am also willing to bet the FAST is alot more efficient in a street or street/strip application, But I do love the feeling of big secondaries opening up on a 4 BBl :)

But if you use a 90 degree elbow that works as a runner which can promote midrange power.

c4boom 11-05-2009 02:16 PM

too bad the dam pro flow is only use full in trucks and swaps what the hell where they thinking when they made that thing if they made it a bit shorter there sales would go up 10 fold.

BrokenFeather78 11-06-2009 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Batman (Post 3726)
I've seen it with the GMPP intake and FAST 90 once, the GMPP intake made about 15 more up top with an 850, but the FAST had a better curve and Average power, not sure how they would have been against each other at the track. I am also willing to bet the FAST is alot more efficient in a street or street/strip application, But I do love the feeling of big secondaries opening up on a 4 BBl :)


I love carbs. Don't care if they are less efficient!!!!

Slowhawk 11-06-2009 01:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by c4boom (Post 3782)
too bad the dam pro flow is only use full in trucks and swaps what the hell where they thinking when they made that thing if they made it a bit shorter there sales would go up 10 fold.

The Pro Flow looks good but from what I've told it's not very great on the power department.

c4boom 11-06-2009 01:48 AM

probably due to the runners being so long the thing chokes on the top end sort of like the TPI cars. i wonder if some one chopped an inch or two out of the runners weld it back up and port match the runners back together if it would work. I would think it should pull a bit better sort of like a sheet metal intake with smaller ports.

Slowhawk 11-23-2009 09:16 PM

Engine bay is done,tranny is here and still waiting on the intake.... Should have it done by next summer...

Batman 11-23-2009 09:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slowhawk (Post 5010)
Engine bay is done,tranny is here and still waiting on the intake.... Should have it done by next summer...

LOL, I know that feeling.....


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.