|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
The turbo motors were 301ci pontiac motors. Thats a LG4 low outpud 305 sbc, honestly someone spent too much $ on that car.. They were turd though, the 301s were junk and so is that 305
__________________
5.3L LSx, Fbody .500 cam, TH400, 4500 Stall, Moser 9" |
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
I would think so, I cant imagine there was alot of knowledge out about turbo motors in the 70s at least nowhere near as much knowledge as there is now.
__________________
1993 BGGM Z28, stock LT1, T56, 175k on original motor, basic bolt-ons. 273 whp, 308wtq. SOLD ![]() 2001 Black WS6 TA Stock....for now.... DD: 2007 Dodge Ram 1500 quad cab sport, 6 inch RCX lift, 35x13.5 tires, 20x9 Fuel wheels, 20% tint all the way around, ZZ customs exhaust, Diablosport Trinity T1000 programmer.
|
|
#13
|
||||
|
||||
|
nice! but that is alot of coin for that thing
__________________
1972 Procharged Trans Am |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Given the rarity of that car, yeah that's about right on the price. Depending on which production # and if it's 100% original then yeah.
And yeah the turbo motors were about as awesome as the 307! Edit: After reading the ad, f--k that! Resto job, not 100% original. Worth $35k-40 at the most imo.
__________________
There is no replacement for displacement... 99 Camaro Z28 M6 - Sold Aug 2013 |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
5k and a 30 pack of Budweiser and we will call it a deal right ?
__________________
![]() 1999 Z28 Camaro SCCA ESP 2013 Tire Rack SCCA Match Tour ESP Class Winner 2014 Tire Rack SCCA Match Tour ESP Trophy Winner Support my 2014 Season like and share facebook.com/87esp | Directtire.com |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
![]()
__________________
![]() 95 Z28 hard top - LT1 | 4L60e | bolt ons | Yank SS3600 | suspension | viking coil overs | 3.42 10 bolt | 3520 lbs - 12.331 @ 108.22mph 1.668 60' 08 Saab 9-7x - L96 6.0 swap | L92 heads/intake/TB | LS6 cam | LS9 springs | 7.425" hardened pushrods | CAI | 1-3/4" stepped LT's | catback | 4L60E | FTI 3000 278mm converter |
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
You know, I didn't really notice that splitter at first
|
![]() |
|
|